I happen to be very glad Derek is no longer on the show. I don't watch it every week but if I'm watching tv at the time and it's on, I tune in. I really like the locations they go to, the 3-d imaging that gives you a feel of the location, hearing a bit of it's history and eye-witness accounts from locales who work and/or have visited there. I like that a parpsychologist is on hand as well, and that he gives his opinion/comments at the end of the show of any evidence obtained. With the newer shows there is far less (if any) screaming, and fewer up the nose shots. =P
Derek was/is just way too over the top, his dramatics of being "possessed" (well rather channeling) seem put on, and frankly often comical. I'm not sure if they air different shows here but he wasn't on the last cpl of shows I've watched, just the new psychic fellow (who I like much better) and the 2nd psychic they bring in. Perhaps they mix in older shows with newer ones which is why we still get to see Derek's mug and his antics?
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
As for whether or not Derek has psi abilities beyond what is innate in us all, I don't know for certain as I've never met the guy nor had a reading from him. However judging by what I've seen on the show (how often he was wrong), hearing of his many foopas (knowing info ahead etc), and the put-on possessions, I'd say no he doesn't have any remarkable abilities.
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
I do think it can beneficial to have a psychic present during an investigation though, provided they actually have some abilities that is.
These reality type shows are often mostly about the drama, creating an effect or feel. I suspect they edit as they do otherwise the shows would be far more boring. If other potential evidence was captured surely it wouldn't be sitting on the editing room floor. So if there isn't enough pn stuff to fill in the time then in comes the drama, bad acting and all.
I agree Nakis, we are a way's away yet from the main populous and the science community as a whole taking this field as seriously as we would hope it would. And yes when has the evidence ever not been inconclusive? Why not do a follow-up investigation very soon after, or do a full 48-72 hours, maybe you'll luck out and capture the same thing so you can at least come to one conclusion.
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
I'm not so sure having a team investigating with a flurry of other bodies always around (camera, sound and lighting crews, locations residents and/or workers at times etc) makes for the best environment in which to conduct a serious investigation. Potential for distractions, false positives created, drama between personalities, and even tampering by individuals hoping for something awesome to be captured to bring further attention to their location etc etc, are real concerns. Not to mention easy to miss something if your busy kapitzing with team members, workers, film crews, worried how you sound/look etc. I have to wonder how much is scripted as well. Though with MH it "appears" they only use their hand-held cameras when one or two members go it alone in a room, so at least those extra distractions etc are lessened some.
You know when you think about it, it's not that often you hear of activity happening when large groups of ppl were present or milling about in the same room/area. It seems most often only a cpl ppl were present to witness it or a handfull at best, and there wasn't during a flurry of other activity going on. Not that it doesn't happen, but even in haunted hotels etc, eye witness accounts seem to usually happen when a worker or a cpl visitors were alone in a room or area. Perhaps there is a reason ghosts/spirits prefer to make their presence known when less ppl are around? A little off-topic from Derek but just something I've considered when watching these reality type shows. =)